What 20 Years in the Wellness Industry Taught Me About Learning
I have a particular kind of relationship with continuing education that I suspect is familiar to most of the estheticians reading this. It goes in two phases.
Phase one: I take a course, workshop, or certification and come home absolutely lit up. I have notes I can barely read because I was writing so fast. I have new vocabulary. I have a framework that reorganizes everything I thought I knew. I tell anyone who will listen about it for approximately two weeks.
Phase two: the notes go in a folder. The framework stays mostly in my head but doesn't quite translate to my hands. The certification goes on my website. And somewhere between the inspiration of phase one and the actual integration into my practice, most of what I learned becomes background knowledge — present, but not quite active.
I've done this cycle more times than I can count. And I've spent the better part of twenty years trying to understand why it happens and what the alternative looks like.
The Certification Industrial Complex
The wellness and esthetic education industry has a complicated relationship with certification. On one hand, certifications are genuinely meaningful — they represent completed training, demonstrated competency, and in some cases significant investment of time and money. On the other hand, the proliferation of certifications in this industry has created a culture where accumulation has become confused with mastery.
I have nine certifications. I list them on my website and in my professional bio. But I want to be honest about what those nine certifications represent and what they don't.
Most of them represent completion — the foundational instruction in a modality. They mean I showed up, paid attention, and demonstrated basic competency. The Vodder lymphatic drainage certification required demonstrated technique proficiency, which made it meaningfully different from certifications that are awarded upon course completion alone. The Ayurvedic Health Counselor program was a multi-year commitment that included clinical hours and comprehensive examinations.
But even the most rigorous certifications I've completed represent the beginning of learning a modality, not the end of it. This is something the certification culture in wellness education rarely says out loud: the certificate is not mastery. It is permission to practice and an obligation to continue.
What I Actually Learned in a Tent in California
The Permaculture Design certificate I completed in Bolinas in 2006 was the most formative educational experience of my life, and I say that having subsequently completed an Ayurvedic Health Counselor program at a legitimate Ayurvedic school.
It was formative not because of the content — though the content was extraordinary — but because of the pedagogical philosophy. Permaculture education is built around observation before intervention. Before you design anything, you observe. You sit with a piece of land through multiple seasons. You watch where the water moves, where the sun hits, where the wind comes from, where the animals already travel. You develop an understanding of what the system is already doing before you decide what to add or change.
I didn't know it at the time, but this was the educational philosophy that would eventually make Ayurvedic medicine feel like coming home. Ayurveda operates from the same premise: observe first. Understand the constitution, the current state, the context. Then intervene — and with the minimum effective intervention, not the maximum available.
Both of these systems taught me something that no weekend workshop has ever taught me: learning is a long, slow, spiraling process, not a linear accumulation of skills. You come back to the same material at different points in your practice and find that you understand it differently — not because the material changed but because you changed. The real education is cumulative in a way that cannot be compressed.
The Teachers Who Changed Me
I've learned from many teachers over twenty years in this industry. The ones who changed me were not always the most credentialed or the most famous. They shared a particular quality that I've come to think of as the thing I'm trying to cultivate in my own teaching: they knew what they didn't know.
The Ayurvedic practitioner who supervised my clinical hours at school had been practicing for over thirty years and routinely said 'I'm still learning this.' Not as a humble disclaimer but as a genuine statement of her relationship to a tradition she regarded as inexhaustible. She treated each client as a new encounter with the system, not as a confirmation of what she already knew. She was the most confident practitioner I've ever observed and simultaneously the most openly uncertain about the limits of her understanding.
The herbalist who trained me in my twenties was the same way — deeply knowledgeable, deeply humble, and completely uninterested in the performance of expertise. She knew thousands of plants and she was endlessly curious about each of them. Her knowledge was alive because she kept touching it, questioning it, asking it new questions.
These practitioners changed my understanding of what learning is for. It's not for the certificate. It's not even primarily for the client, though the client benefits enormously when the practitioner is genuinely engaged in ongoing learning. It is for the life of the practice itself — for keeping the work alive, interesting, and worth showing up for after twenty years.
The Mistakes That Taught Me More Than the Courses
I want to talk about this because it's the part of practitioner development that education almost never addresses, and that I think is enormously important.
I've made mistakes. I've overtreated Pitta skin with techniques that were appropriate for Kapha and watched a client's rosacea flare significantly after a treatment I thought was helping. I've worked too deeply on a client who was more depleted than I recognized and had her leave the table so fatigued she needed to sit in her car for twenty minutes before she could drive. I've given home care recommendations that were technically correct but practically unworkable for someone's life, and watched them disengage from the treatment program as a result.
Every one of these mistakes taught me something that no course could have — because the feedback was immediate, embodied, and clinically specific. The learning that comes from getting something wrong, recognizing that you got it wrong, understanding why, and adjusting is different in quality from the learning that comes from being taught what to do correctly. Both are necessary. The willingness to make and learn from mistakes is what converts the second kind of learning into the first.
This is part of why I believe so strongly in practitioners building their own cases — seeing their own clients with the frameworks they've learned in education — rather than spending years accumulating certifications before practicing. The practice is the education. The classroom is preparation for the practice.
Nobody told me that the best teacher I would ever have was the client on my table who didn't respond the way the textbook said she would.
What I'm Still Learning
Sound healing. I came to it late — my Sound Bath Practitioner certification is from 2025 — and I came to it somewhat skeptically, as someone who had spent twenty years in evidence-informed clinical practice. And it has been one of the most humbling educational experiences of my career.
Not because the theory is difficult (it isn't, particularly), but because the practice is entirely about listening — and I have discovered, twenty years in, that my listening skills needed significant development. Sound work has no technique to fall back on when the feeling of the session gets uncertain. There is no dosha assessment to rely on, no protocol to follow, no product selection decision that structures the treatment. There is only the quality of your attention and the sounds you offer and the space you hold for what arises.
I have learned more about presence in the past two years of sound practice than in the previous eighteen years of hands-on work. And I am genuinely humbled by how much further I have to go.
This is what I want to offer you from twenty years of learning in this field: the work never stops asking more of you. The certifications accumulate, the knowledge deepens, the technique fluency develops — and then the work asks for something else. Something subtler. Something that cannot be learned from a book or a workshop.
The practitioners who stay alive in this work after twenty years are not the ones who have the most training. They are the ones who are still curious. Still willing to be wrong. Still in genuine relationship with the traditions they practice from, rather than simply proficient in the techniques those traditions produced.
Tending Practice is built for that kind of learner. Not for credential collectors — for people who want to go deep, stay curious, and keep showing up for a practice that will keep asking more of them. If that's you, you're in exactly the right place.
→ Join the Tending Practice Collective (tendingpractice.com/community)
→ See upcoming workshops (tendingpractice.com/workshops)
→ Browse what I teach (tendingpractice.com/what-i-teach)
